The Competition Commission has dismissed allegations of unfair business practices against the producers of Vidya Balan-starrer ‘Kahaani 2’ movie, which was released last year.  K Sera Sera Digital Cinema had moved the regulator after the film’s producers — Pen Indiaand Boundscript Motion Pictures — refused to provide the movie to it for exhibition.
Among others, it was alleged that the movie was given only to UFO Moviez India and Real Image Media Technologies. As per the complaint, Pen India, Boundscript, UFO Moviez and Real Image Media had entered into an anti-competitive agreement with a view to limit or control the release of the film.  In its order dated June 21, Competition Commission of India (CCI) said there is no substance in K Sera Sera’s allegation that the producers refused to provide the movie due to anti-competitive pact with UFO Moviez and Real Image Media.  The regulator has concluded that there was no violation of Section 3 of the Competition Act that pertains to anti- competitive agreements.  Pen India had also submitted to the CCI copies of a news article about a complaint filed by producer Viacom18 against K Sera Sera in relation to online piracy of the movie Force-2 that was released in November 2016.  “… It was reported that the investigations conducted by Viacom18 revealed that pirated copies had originated from the copy that was sent to the informant (K Sera Sera) for digital integration,” CCI said in its order citing contents of the news article.  In the 9-page order, the regulator said K Sera Sera has neither refuted the allegations reported in the news article during the oral hearing nor adduced any documents to rebut the same in their written submissions after the oral hearing. “The Commission observes that the complete silence on the part of the informant (K Sera Sera) on the issue of online piracy as raised in the…News article indicates that the allegation of OP 1 (Pen India) is not baseless and have some substance in it. “Thus, an objective business rationale to protect the commercial interest of OP 1 and OP 2 (Boundscript Motion) cannot be overlooked in a proceeding under the (Competition) Act unless the same is shown to have exclusionary effects or is tainted with an anti-competitive objective,” the order noted.  The Times of  India : 24th. June,17


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: